A top adviser to President Trump reveals the US has spent $12 billion so far on the joint military offensive against Iran with Israel, amid efforts to downplay economic impacts.

Escalating Costs of the US-Israel Offensive

The United States has now shelled out approximately $12 billion on its military campaign against Iran, according to Kevin Hassett, a senior White House economic adviser.

This figure covers expenditures since the launch of joint strikes alongside Israel, which have been underway for over two weeks. Hassett shared this update during an interview on CBS News, emphasizing that the amount reflects briefings on costs incurred to date.

The revelation comes as the conflict intensifies, with Pentagon estimates showing expenses had already topped $11.3 billion in just the first six days. Those early costs were fueled by intensive use of precision-guided munitions and sustained air operations.

Administration officials stress that this tally does not account for the full scope of a campaign projected to continue for several more weeks, leaving open the question of how much higher the bill might climb.

Administration Reassures on Economic Front

“The $12 billion was what I was briefed has been spent so far,” Hassett said, adding that no additional funding from Congress is needed at this stage and the government is taking steps to protect American industries from disruptions.

White House spokespeople are working hard to calm public concerns, insisting the war will not derail the US economy or demand emergency congressional appropriations. Energy Secretary Chris Wright has gone further, predicting the operation could wrap up in weeks.

To mitigate potential fallout, the administration is broadening permits for energy and fertilizer imports from nations like Venezuela and Morocco. They're also easing restrictions to allow more foreign ships to ferry jet fuel from the Gulf of Mexico to the West Coast.

Hassett brushed off Iranian threats of economic retaliation, pointing to America's evolved position as a top oil producer, unlike the vulnerabilities exposed during the 1970s energy crisis. This self-reliance, he argues, positions the US to weather any storms better than adversaries.

Human Toll and Geopolitical Ripples

The strikes have exacted a heavy price on the ground. Reports indicate around 1,200 fatalities in Iran, including the former supreme leader Ali Khamenei, underscoring the operation's precision and reach. On the US side, 14 service members have lost their lives.

Geopolitically, the conflict has prompted President Trump to seek international assistance in securing the Strait of Hormuz, a vital chokepoint for global oil flows. This move highlights worries over disruptions that could keep oil prices elevated for American consumers in the coming weeks.

On Capitol Hill, lawmakers are pressing for transparency as costs mount. Congressional aides anticipate a White House request for supplemental funding, potentially ranging from tens of billions, though specifics remain fluid. The push reflects bipartisan calls for detailed briefings on the war's trajectory.

Broader implications loom large, with analysts warning of a potential global economic "nightmare" from supply chain snarls and energy market volatility. Yet, US leaders project confidence, framing the offensive as a necessary step toward regional stability.

In summary, the $12 billion price tag on the US-Iran war so far underscores the operation's intensity, even as officials downplay long-term economic risks and human losses mount on both sides. The path forward hinges on swift resolution and congressional support.

• Tags
• #Politics
• #Military
• #Economy