A New York City software engineer publicly defends his Indian colleagues at Citadel, challenging online stereotypes portraying them as incompetent in the tech industry.

Sparks Fly Over Tech Stereotypes

In the fast-paced world of tech, where diversity fuels innovation, an ugly undercurrent of bias sometimes surfaces online.

A recent anonymous post on X from an account called "Brotherhood" ignited controversy by painting Indian professionals as incompetent and manipulative. The post claimed these workers habitually labeled routine tasks as "super-urgent," used intimidation, and name-dropped to push their agendas. Such accusations struck a nerve amid ongoing debates about race, competence, and workplace dynamics in Silicon Valley and beyond.

John Freeman, a software engineer based in New York City and working at the prestigious hedge fund Citadel, couldn't let it slide. His sharp rebuttal quickly went viral, drawing widespread attention to the issue. Freeman's words cut through the noise, offering a firsthand counterpoint rooted in daily collaboration.

A Colleague's Strong Defense

Freeman didn't mince words in his response, drawing directly from his experiences at Citadel.

He highlighted the leadership roles filled by Indian professionals in his chain of command, emphasizing their skills and demeanor.

Let's talk about Indian competence. My team lead is Indian. My boss is Indian. His boss, who hired both of us, is Indian. His boss, the CTO, is Indian. They're all pretty sharp! They know this business inside and out. They work well with others. Everyone is super friendly. They all speak English very well.

This quote resonated widely, as it challenged the anonymity of the original post with concrete, personal testimony. Freeman added that in his year at the company, he'd never encountered anyone—of any background—who treated every task as a top priority crisis. He even recalled a previous Indian boss who excelled in the role.

His parting shot was particularly pointed: if incompetence seems rampant, perhaps the problem lies with the hiring practices at that workplace, not the individuals. This perspective shifted the conversation from blame to accountability.

Broader Context in Tech's Diversity Struggles

Freeman's intervention comes at a time when Indian talent plays a pivotal role in America's tech sector.

Companies like Citadel, Google, and Microsoft boast numerous Indian executives and engineers, many arriving via H-1B visas and rising through the ranks on merit. Umesh Subramanian, the Indian CTO Freeman referenced, led Citadel's tech efforts for seven years before recently stepping down, underscoring the trust placed in such leaders.

Yet, stereotypes persist, fueled by frustrations over competition, cultural differences, or isolated bad experiences. Indian professionals often report facing microaggressions, like being overlooked for promotions despite strong performance, or enduring questions about their "fit" in leadership roles.

Social media reactions to Freeman's post were largely supportive, with users noting how Indian-origin CEOs frequently climb internally, proving their grasp of business and teams. One commenter observed that competence correlates with success regardless of origin. Still, the episode highlights the need for tech firms to foster inclusive environments where biases don't fester online or offline.

Efforts to combat discrimination include diversity training and mentorship programs aimed at breaking invisible barriers. Freeman's voice adds to a growing chorus calling out racism in its tracks.

Freeman's bold stand serves as a reminder that real-world experiences often debunk harmful generalizations. By sharing his positive encounters, he not only defended his colleagues but also sparked vital dialogue on meritocracy in tech. As conversations about workplace equity continue, stories like this reinforce that talent knows no borders.

• Tags
• #Technology
• #Diversity
• #Workplace